Venkatesan Muthukrishnan

to presidentofind., secy_mop, asarpg, aspension

show details

9:41 am (30 minutes ago)

Respected Hon'ble Presidentji,
Namaste.
Attached copies of the documents are self explanatory.I am a fourth stage cancer patient waging a lone battle against commerce ministry who cheated over 750 employees by fraudulent circulars without involving nodal agencies like DOPT/DP&PW. As the custodian of the Pension Act please initiate some action to relieve my mental agony unlike other agencies who made a mockery of citizens charter.
I am not begging for alms & my legitimate right for pension had been deprived stealthily by Govt.department in violation of the constitutional provisions.

Thanking you.
Sincerely your's
Venktesan.M
16,Raja Apartments,
15,BKN street,Westmambalam,
Chennai-33

BENEFITS RECEIVED UNDER ILLEGAL SVRS-1994

PIECEMEAL PAYMENT OF TERMINAL BENEFITS RECEIVED UNDER PROTEST

APPLIED FOR VRS ON 08/07/1994
RELIEVED ON 19/07/1994

Ist Payment on 02/01/1995 -----Rs.4,41,331/= Interest due from EIA-5Months
IInd Payment DA 03/08/1995 ----Rs. 12,812/= -do- -13Months
IIIrd -do-Weightage 06/10/1997 -Rs. 56,556/= -do- -39Months
------------------------------------------------------
Total Rs.5,10,689/=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WP-16155/1997 pending in Chennai High Court
SVRS-1994 scheme suffered following infirmities:
1.Restoration of pension after 15 years not mentioned.
2.Silent about treatment of DA @114%.
3.Also violated by ignoring the Family Pension to which every widow of pensioner is entitled.
4.Manipulation of original circular issued by commerce ministry to suppress the facts- A Blatant violation of constitutional provisions.

Gmail - CIC's reply on my complaint-requested

JOKE of 61st.I.Day - Google Docs

JOKE OF THE 61st. INDIAN INDEPENDANCE DAY !!!!!

“ Government of India promises old age pension for Senior Citizens while the Commerce Ministry fraudulently cheated their employees to deprive their fundamental rights of pension, family pension etc.(who were covered under CCS Pension rules of 1972 for which Hon’ble President is the custodian) in total violation of the Constitutional Provisions.”

For full details of Commerce Ministry’s fraud please visit: http://venkym.blogspot.com/

Apart from my battle with Commerce ministry now I have to fight with my Prostate Cancer also.
Latest events:
14.07.07 Tested PSA blood test-Value reported 92.19n.g/mL.
18.0707 Bone scan done at Madras Medical Mission revealed spots with metastatic deposits.
19.07.07 Trucut needle biopsy done by Prof.R.P.Rajan at PHC.
24.07.07 Apollo hospital confirmed Acinar Adenocarcinoma (Gleasons score 3+4) Prostate.(4th.stage)
27.07.07 Prof.R.P.Rajan performed orchidectomy at J.V.Hospital to arrest Androgen activity.

WAITING FOR "DIVINE" JUSTICE

Perhaps what cannot be won in a Court of Law becomes otherwise a reality by means of seemingly "heavenly intervention!" - NEMESIS

Nemesis

by Micha F. Lindemans

In Greek mythology, Nemesis is the goddess of divine justice and vengeance. Her anger is directed toward human transgression of the natural, right order of things and of the arrogance causing it. Nemesis pursues the insolent and the wicked with inflexible vengeance. Her cult probably originated from Smyrna. She is regarded as the daughter of Oceanus or Zeus, but according to Hesiod she is a child of Erebus and Nyx.

She is portrayed as serious looking woman with in her left hand a whip, a rein, a sword, or a pair of scales. In the Hellenistic period she was portrayed with a steering wheel. Also called Rhamnusia, from a temple and statue of her in Rhamnus, a village in the northern part of Attica. The epithet Adrasteia "she whom none can escape", properly of the those of the Phrygian Cybele, was later applied to her.

Inspite of all adverse reports we still believe in INDIAN JUDICIARY & ITS REJUVINATION



The BayHeresy: Indian Judiciary Fact of the Day: "Indian Judiciary Fact of the Day

As of February 2006, 33,635 cases were pending in the Supreme Court with 26 judges; 3,341,040 cases in the high courts with 670 judges; and 25,306,458 cases in the 13,204 subordinate courts. This vast backlog leads to long adjournments and prompts people to pay to speed up the process. In 1999, it was estimated: ‘At the current rate of disposal it would take another 350 years for disposal of the pending cases even if no other cases were added.’

The ratio of judges is abysmally low at 12–13 per one million persons, compared to 107 in the United States, 75 in Canada and 51 in the United Kingdom. If the number of outstanding cases were assigned to the current number of judges, caseloads would average 1,294 cases per Supreme Court judge, 4,987 per high court judge and 1,916 cases per judge in the lower courts. Vacancies compound the problem. In March 2006, there were three vacancies in the Supreme Court, 131 in the high courts and 644 in the lower courts. Judges cope with such case lists by declaring adjournments. This prompts people to pay ‘speed money’.


-Indolence in India’s judiciary, Global Corruption Report 2007, p.215"esian
########################
globalinfo.org - May 31, INDIA (#50630): "INDIA: BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION PLAGUE JUDICIARY SYSTEM

By Praful Bidwai MORE BY THIS AUTHOR

NEW DELHI, May 31, 2007 (IPS/GIN) -- More than three-quarters of people in India believe that the country's judiciary system is corrupt, according to a new survey.

The 'Global Corruption Report 2007' highlighted the lack of public trust in India's judiciary, which many feel is overbearing and democratically unaccountable.

Compiled by Transparency International, the report is based on a 2005 countrywide survey of 'public perceptions and experiences of corruption in the lower judiciary,' which was conducted by the Center for Media Studies. The survey found that 77 percent of respondents believe the Indian judiciary is corrupt.

It also noted that 'bribes seem to be solicited as the price of getting things done.' An estimated $580 million was paid in bribes during a 12-month period, according to the report. 'Money was paid to the officials in the following proportions: 61 percent to lawyers; 29 percent to court officials; 5 percent to middlemen,' it said.

'This is a wake-up call not just for India's legal system, but for society and the state itself,' said Upendra Baxi, a highly regarded Indian jurist. 'It confirms what we have known for years and casts a shadow on the integrity of the judiciary. It also "

MOCKERRY OF FRIENDLY CITIZENS CHARTER!!!!!!

This is a classic example to prove that much trumpeted grievance handling system of the Govt. of India is just a FARCE.

"Whistleblowing"

Commerce Ministry’s fraud On Govt.Employees Covered Under CCS Pension Rules-1972

Export Inspection Council-a statutory body under Commerce Dept. which is also an “administrative ministry” implemented a special voluntary retirement scheme (SVRS)in 1994 fraudulently without involving the NODAL departments-in violation of Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules made by His Excellency The President of India under Article 77(3) of Indian Constitution.

Thus ILLEGAL SVRS-1994 has floated all rules/norms applicable under CCS Pension Rules of 1972 in gross violation of Articles 309, 313, 372 &144 of the Constitution.

This clandestine action is being covered by the following departments willfully for reasons best known to them:

1.Department of Personnel & Training.

2.Department of Pension & Pensioners Welfare.

3.Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances.

4.Central Information Commission.

For more details please visit : http://venkym.blogspot.com/

FRIENDLY CITIZEN’S CHARTERS!!!! Record of my efforts in search of justice: It took 11years &5 months to get a correct informtion on SVRS.Thanks to Right to Informtion Act-2005 !!!!God only knows when my ordeal will end!!!!!!!!!
1. 30.05.1994 Letter asking EIA, Madras for clarifications on VRS terms.
2. 31.05.1994-MS/ADMN/Gen/94-95-1134 -Refusal reply.
3. 06.06.1994-Letter to EIA, Madras on Pay commission & other doubts. (Not replied)
4. 06.12.1994-Letter on Non payment of VRS benefits. (Not replied)
5. 06.01.1995-Part payment received under protest.
6. 07.01.1995-Letter for pending payment & interest. (No reply)
7. 25.01.1995-Reminder for payment/protest. (No reply)
8. 29.03.1995-Letter to the then Commerce Secretary . (No reply)
9. 29.03.1995-Copy to Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions.
10. 21.04.1995-Reply from above ministry; F.No36306/3/DCOM/PD-95
11. 17.04.1997-Letter to Director for payment of weightage & DA (No reply)
12. 06.10.1997-Part payment received under protest.
13. 13.10.1997-Letter asking full VRS benefits. (No reply)
14. 14.10.1997-Letter to DD on payment. (No reply)
15. 23.11.2000-Appeal to Commerce secretary-citing Calcutta High Court order No: 6373(W) of 1995 Dt.26.11.1996 with copies to the Under Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions/Secretary-Pension & Pensioners Welfare/Director-Inspection & Quality Control. (No replies).
16. 04.02.2003-Letter to the Secretary, Directorate of Public Grievances-DPG/M/2003/80011 (Replied on 17.02.03).
17. 14.02.2003-Copy to Joint Secretary, Vigilance/Staff grievances (Shri.S.Ramasundaram) fax/email.(No reply)
18. 20.03.2003-Fax Reminder to The Commerce Secretary ( Shri. Dipak Chatterji).
19. 26.03.2003-Final appeal to the Hon’ble Minister for Commerce, Govt. of India.
20. 02.04.2003-Reply fm Shri.Mangal singh,Under Sec.,Dt.28.03.2003.
21. 10.04.2003-sent fax to Under.Sec. for a specific reply on the complaint.(sent post copy also-29/4)
22. 17.05.2003-Reply Dt.09.05.2003 fm Under Sec.
23. 23.06.2003-Recd.copy of communication Dt.31.05.2003sent by Shri.L.V.Saptharishi directing D(Q/C) to give a reply by 15.06.2003.
24. 24.07.2003-Fax reminder to the Addl.Sec.Shri.L.V.Saptharishi. (No reply)
25. 18.08.2003-Fax to Jt.Sec.Shri.P.K.Deb.,DOPT.request for documents.
26. 12.09.2003-EIC reply:vrs/121/2003/4409-dt.9/9/2003 received.(inadequate reply)
27. 13.09.2003 fax appeal for documents to EIC & DOPT (No reply)
28. 21.09.2003 fax reminder for DQC/EIC. (No reply)
29. 02.10.2003 fax reminder for DQC. (No reply)
30. 02,10.2003 fax message for Secretary S.S.Dawra, DOPT (No reply)
31. 02.10.2003 fax message for Jt.Sec.(AT&A)IFC/DOPT (No reply)
32. 06.10.2003 fax copy to EIA,Chennai. (No reply)
33. 15.10.2003 Final fax reminder for DQC.(No reply)
34. 29.10.2003 Fax to shri.S.S.Dawra, Secretary,DOPT.(No reply)
35. 31.10.2003 Fax to shri.Arun Jaitley,Hon’ble Commerce minister.(No reply)
36. 15.11.2003 Fax to DQC/EIC.(No reply)
37. 08.3.2004 Fax to Shri.Alok/Shri.MVPC Sastry with email copies.(No reply)
38. 23.04.04 Fax appeal to DOPT
39. 07.06.2004 DOPT reply recd.-Note sheet.
40. 26.02.2005 Appeal to the Hon’ble President Of India by email/Fax.
41. 18.06.2005 Fax to Dr.Kalaam, Hon’ble President Of India.
42. 20.06.2005 Fax appeal to DQC/EIC.(No reply)
43. 08.08.2005 under Right to Information Act-fax to Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Pensions & Public Grievances.
44. 17.08.2005 Reply recd from DPT.
45. 04.10.2005 under Right to Information Act-fax to Secretary, Ministry of Commerce.
46. 04.10.2005 Fax to Mr.E.V.K.S.Elangovan-MOS for Commerce.
47. 10.10.2005 EIC finally replied with a letter Dt.21.05.1994 from Ministry of Commerce which admitted that this SVRS-1994 is not approved by the Govt. Of India. In spite of the Govt. refusal for SVRS-1994 The Commerce Ministry has arbitrarily/hurriedly/deliberately implemented the SVRS without involving nodal agency (DPT) in gross violation of Article 77(3) 309 of the Constitution. Hence this ambiguous SVRS-1994 circular Dt.21/5/1994 implemented by Commerce Ministry is ILLEGAL as it has violated the CCS Pension Rules of 1972 & the Articles 309,313,372 and 144 of the Constitution.
Though the scheme was claimed as VOLUNTARY, I was forced to submit the option Vide letter no: EIA: MS/Admn/gen/94-95/1134 dt.31.5.1994 even before clarifying the terms of the scheme on my first query Dt.30.05.1994.
SVRS-1994 circular dated 21st.May 1994 circulated by EIC deliberately omitted the facts contained in the ministry circular. Thus I have been deprived/kept in dark deliberately from opting Normal VRS under CCS pension rules.
I would not have opted this ILLEGAL SVRS-1994 had I received the original ministry’s circular (unedited by EIC).
So I am prepared to REPAY SOCALLED INCENTIVES received by me to ACCEPT THE NORMAL VRS Pension under CCS pension rules.

48. 17.10.2005 sought information under RIAct-2005- No reply
49. 13.12.2005 sent DD for information- Recd. Irrelevant information.
50. 21.12.2005 appeal to EIC appellate authority- No reply
51. 13.03.2006 e-mail to Smt.Shyamalima Banerjee. DIRECTOR (Public Grievances),DAR & PG, New Delhi. No reply. Recd. Directive on 6/5/06 to approach Dr.M.S.Rao,Jt.Sec.commerce.
52. 17.03.2006 reminder to appellate authority- No reply.
53. 18.04.2006 Fax appeal to commerce Secretary to activate EIC. (with copy to EIC)
54. 20.04.2006 Recd. Part of information from EIC.
55. 20.04.2006 Fax to appellate authority. Please kindly note another appeal-RT1124 on the ambiguous EIC circular is still pending before you. (with regard to the suppression of facts & allocation of business rules).
56. 06.05.2006 Latest Appeal to Smt.Shyamalima Banerjee,Diector (public Grievances).
57. 06.05.2006 Appeal copy forwarded to Dr.M.S.Rao
58. 07.05.2005 Appeal c.c to: Staff Grievance Officer, Shri P.K. Mahapatra, Joint Secretary, Room No. 247, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi (Tele fax No. 23063461; E-mail: pkmahapatra@nic.in ).
55-A 15.05.006 Fax to The Apellate Authority,EIC
59. 16.05.2006 Appeal DPG-59faxed to EIC for onward transmission to Dr.M.S.R
60. 19.05.2006 c.c by fax to:Shri.R.Ramanujam,Jt.Sec.,DOPT
61. 20.05.2006 Fax /email appeal to PMO
62. 31.05.2006 c.c of 61 to Shri.Kamalnath,Commerce minister,GOI.
63. 01.06.2006 c.c -----------do---------Residence
64. 05.06.2006 c.c to Officer incharge,EIA,Chennai.
65. 06.06.2006 RIA-Christy Fernando,EIC Appellate committee.
66. 12.06.2006 RIA-Hon’ble Central Chief Infn.Commissioner.
67. 17.06.2006 c.c of Ref-61 to Commerce Minister.
68. 26.06.2006 c.c of Ref-PMO61 to Central Chief Information Commissioner.
69. 03.07.2006 email to CIC
70. 03.07.2006 email to KABIR (NGO)-Ref-68 (Ack. Mail recd.on4.7.06)
71. 06.07.2006 Fax & email to DQC-asking for ack.Grieva3/3/06 of Com.ministry.
72. 06.07.2006 online Gri.regn-DPG-59(DARPG/E/2006/06471)
73. 14.07.2006 Fax/email Reminder to Griev.cell,Director,commerceDept.FT(coord).
74. 17.07.2006 email to CIC/KABIR
74A.20.07.2006 email reminder-II to EIC/C.Secretary.
75.24.07.2006 email to Smt. Soniya Gandhi,Congress President.
76. 04.08.2006 email to C.Secretary for status report
77. 23.08.2006 Reminder-IV to C.S/EIC
78. 24.08.2006 Fax to Shri.kamalnath,MC&I.
79. 01.09.2006 Fax to DIQC final reminder.
80. 01.09.2006 fax to DARPG with cc to.DOPT,PP&W,PMO
81. 02/3.09.06 Fax to Dr.MSRao,Final reminder
82. 06.09.2006 Fax/email to PKMahapatra Udyog bhawan with cc to EIC
83. 06.09.2006 Fax reply to EIC for rejecting my appeal
84. 12.09.2006 Fax to DARPG -84 with cc to PMO
84a.14.09.2006 Fax to Rahul Sarin. Addl.Secretary, DARPG.
85. 17.09.2006 email to CJI, Ref –CJI-85 with c.c to CJ,Chennai HC.
86. 02.10.2006 Reply to AnjuSharma,Commerce Ministry
87.23.11.2006 Fax to C.Secretary-Final appeal for settlement
88.22.12.2006 Fax to DARPG-88 with c.c to PMO
89.15.12.2007 Fax to DARPG-89 with c.c to PMO on 14/2/07

90. 22.01.2008 Fax/email to Hon’ble President.

91. 04.02.2008 Fax to CJ,Chennai-WP-16155.

92. 09.02.2008 Fax/mail to CIC-Ref.08/02

93. 09.02.2008 Fax to AN Tiwari CIC-Ref.DPT-69

94. 10.02.2008 Fax to CIC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efforts are on to highlight soon through the mass media, how the much trumpeted Grievance Handling System of the Govt.& Grievance redressal machinery have become a mockery!!!! Please visit the website: http://venkym.blogspot.com