DIFFERENT YARDSTICKS OF DOPT FOR EMPLOYEES OF SAME DEPARTMENT
PASSING THE BUCK TO THE SUBORDINATE DEPARTMENT
( Export inspection agency, under the Commerce Ministry )
1. To avoid misuse of power, Allocation of Business Rules &Transaction of Business Rules Act-1961 under Art. 77/3 of the Constitution, empowered only Dept.of Personnel & Training as NODAL dept. for framing rules/regulations with regard to Govt. personnel. All other ministries have to implement the same.
2. Commerce Ministry is a subordinate ministry which has no powers to frame schemes for personnel, has fraudulently introduced a SVRS in 1994 without involving the DOPT (department of personnel & training) in violation of all Constitutional provisions
3. Any VRS should have the approval of DOPT or be passed by a Parliament session. Since 1994- SVRS has no statutory backing, it is just an executive fiat liable to be set-aside by the Hon’ble high court under Article 226.
4. Commerce Ministry’s original circular was edited deliberately to suppress vital information-a clandestine act to cheat Govt. employees who were covered by the CCS Pension Rules-1972.
This was submitted to the website of Presidents secratriate on 27/07/2009.DOPT took one long year to give the following evasive reply:
Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2009/01246
Name : Shri Venkatesan.M
Date of Receipt : 27 Jul 2009
Current Status : Case disposed of
Date of Action : 06 Jul 2010
Details : The matter does not concern DOPT. Forwarded to Department of Commerce vide O.M.No.23011/4/2009-P.G. dated 5.10.2009 who have further forwarded the representation to EI&EP Section of Department of Commerce vide their letter No. 1/34/2009-TFS dated 21.12.2009 for disposal.
I HAVE APPROCHED DOPT FOR JUSTICE, DOPT INSTEAD OF GIVING ITS DECISION as per the DOPTcircular.F.No.27/8/2007/EO/SM.II Dt.28.12.2007 it DIRECTS THE COMMERCE MINISTRY-WHICH COMMITTED THE FRAUD TO ANSWER!!!!!!!
If DOPT is not concerned with Export inspection agency’s 1994 SVRS, HOW DOPT VRS CIRCULAR WAS ISSUED TO THE SAME DEPARTMENT IN 2002 WITH PENSION?

No comments:
Post a Comment