Dishonesty (or fraud) and malice in exercising statutory powers

SHRI.S.LAKSHMIKANTHAN THE THEN INCHARGE DIRECTOR OF EIC, UNDER THE DICTION OF COMMERCE MINISTRY EXCERSIED HIS POWER FRAUDULENTLY TO IMPLEMENT THE 1994-ILLEGAL VRS FOR SOME PETTY BENEFITS-HENCE IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL,EXCESSIVE OR ARBITRARY
Showing posts with label Current status of cases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Current status of cases. Show all posts

Friday, June 26, 2009

Kochi case hearing comesup on 29th.June ,Monday
COURT 3C ( 17) 29/06/2009
916. WP(C) 34008/2005(W) SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.)/

& CM.Appl. 7750/2006 SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR
& CM.Appl. 2963/2007 SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

EIA employees cases-WP/WA-Status
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
1. Sunil Kumar Das + 27 others WP-6373-1995 Judgement Dt.26.11.1996
EIA has been directed to pay all dues with 12% interest within one month & directed the employees to take up other issues(rights) in appropriate fora.
2. EIC filed CAN Application -9099-1998 but dismissed by court.
3.MAT2344 OF 2001
4. SMA102OF 2004
5.CAN5882OF 2007(all these are related to item no.2)
6.Mat-3762/3763-1998
7. Sukriti bhusan Roy-W.P-574 -2008 -Challenging the Scheme &Demands restoration of Pension-Final hearing over-Judgment awaited.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHENNAI HIGH COURT
1. R.S.Balasubramaniam WP-13104-1997 Demands DA-On 9.6.2008 judge directed EIA to pay as they did in Kolkatta.-Response from EIC awaited.
2. M.Venkatesan WP-16155-1997 Demands Pension -A fresh writ is also being filed to speedup as revised prayer may or may not be considered by the sitting Judge at the time of hearing. **
3. S.Krishnamurthy WP-16289-1997 ------Do---------- **
4. Ramasubramanian+12 others WP-12030-1998 weightage + pension **
5. K.E.Ramalingam WP-660-1999 Dismissed by bench on appeal. –Demands DA
6. N.Kalyanaraman + 7 others WP-958-1999 –Demand pension **
7. E.P.Srinivasan & V.N -WP-46130-2002 **
(Posted for hearing by Bench 6 cases(2-7) on 30th.July2008)Judgment delivered on 16th.Sep -Pension declined & employees directed to EIA for DA/DR.
8. Sethuramanathan WP-9466-2006 Demands pension
9.M.Venkatesan WP-10442-2008-Challenging the scheme as the cause of action is totally changed -Pending
** On 24.6.2008 Judge referred all 6 cases for Full bench hearing as EIA did not provide the details of SLP it filed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KOCHI HIGH COURT
WA-617-2000
WA-42- 2001
WA-676-2002 All three WAppeals dismissed on 29.10.2004-An unique judgement directing the petitioners to appeal to the ministry.(treated like beggars)
WP-34008-2005 Some petitioners have gone for Revision Petition.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MUMBAI HIGH COURT
1.WP-1391-2000 by 13 persons-Pending
2.WP-214-2003 by 18 persons-Pending
Prayer: Full DA or surrender of 2/3rd. commuted pension for resumption of Full pension & 5years weightage for those with 15years qualifying service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW DELHI HIGH COURT/SUPREME COURT
Civil Writ-5335-1995 is still pending.
LPA-(Letter Patent Appeal) 454-2001 by 23 people-Dismissed on the principle of estoppel as they have not challenged the legality & the validity of the scheme but demanded more benefits under the scheme.
Supreme court-Petition for Special Leave to Appeal-9772-2003-Also dismissed.
Review Petition No.1201-2003 in SLP-9772-2003-Dismissed.
*Fresh writ filed challenging the scheme by Mr.Saxena
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------