Apart from my battle with Commerce ministry now I have to fight with my Prostate Cancer also.
Latest events:
14.07.07 Tested PSA blood test-Value reported 92.19n.g/mL.
18.0707 Bone scan done at Madras Medical Mission revealed spots with metastatic deposits.
19.07.07 Trucut needle biopsy done by Prof.R.P.Rajan at PHC.
24.07.07 Apollo hospital confirmed Acinar Adenocarcinoma (Gleasons score 3+4) Prostate.(4th.stage)
27.07.07 Prof.R.P.Rajan performed orchidectomy at J.V.Hospital to arrest Androgen activity.

WAITING FOR "DIVINE" JUSTICE

Perhaps what cannot be won in a Court of Law becomes otherwise a reality by means of seemingly "heavenly intervention!" - NEMESIS

Nemesis

by Micha F. Lindemans

In Greek mythology, Nemesis is the goddess of divine justice and vengeance. Her anger is directed toward human transgression of the natural, right order of things and of the arrogance causing it. Nemesis pursues the insolent and the wicked with inflexible vengeance. Her cult probably originated from Smyrna. She is regarded as the daughter of Oceanus or Zeus, but according to Hesiod she is a child of Erebus and Nyx.

She is portrayed as serious looking woman with in her left hand a whip, a rein, a sword, or a pair of scales. In the Hellenistic period she was portrayed with a steering wheel. Also called Rhamnusia, from a temple and statue of her in Rhamnus, a village in the northern part of Attica. The epithet Adrasteia "she whom none can escape", properly of the those of the Phrygian Cybele, was later applied to her.

Inspite of all adverse reports we still believe in INDIAN JUDICIARY & ITS REJUVINATION



The BayHeresy: Indian Judiciary Fact of the Day: "Indian Judiciary Fact of the Day

As of February 2006, 33,635 cases were pending in the Supreme Court with 26 judges; 3,341,040 cases in the high courts with 670 judges; and 25,306,458 cases in the 13,204 subordinate courts. This vast backlog leads to long adjournments and prompts people to pay to speed up the process. In 1999, it was estimated: ‘At the current rate of disposal it would take another 350 years for disposal of the pending cases even if no other cases were added.’

The ratio of judges is abysmally low at 12–13 per one million persons, compared to 107 in the United States, 75 in Canada and 51 in the United Kingdom. If the number of outstanding cases were assigned to the current number of judges, caseloads would average 1,294 cases per Supreme Court judge, 4,987 per high court judge and 1,916 cases per judge in the lower courts. Vacancies compound the problem. In March 2006, there were three vacancies in the Supreme Court, 131 in the high courts and 644 in the lower courts. Judges cope with such case lists by declaring adjournments. This prompts people to pay ‘speed money’.


-Indolence in India’s judiciary, Global Corruption Report 2007, p.215"esian
########################
globalinfo.org - May 31, INDIA (#50630): "INDIA: BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION PLAGUE JUDICIARY SYSTEM

By Praful Bidwai MORE BY THIS AUTHOR

NEW DELHI, May 31, 2007 (IPS/GIN) -- More than three-quarters of people in India believe that the country's judiciary system is corrupt, according to a new survey.

The 'Global Corruption Report 2007' highlighted the lack of public trust in India's judiciary, which many feel is overbearing and democratically unaccountable.

Compiled by Transparency International, the report is based on a 2005 countrywide survey of 'public perceptions and experiences of corruption in the lower judiciary,' which was conducted by the Center for Media Studies. The survey found that 77 percent of respondents believe the Indian judiciary is corrupt.

It also noted that 'bribes seem to be solicited as the price of getting things done.' An estimated $580 million was paid in bribes during a 12-month period, according to the report. 'Money was paid to the officials in the following proportions: 61 percent to lawyers; 29 percent to court officials; 5 percent to middlemen,' it said.

'This is a wake-up call not just for India's legal system, but for society and the state itself,' said Upendra Baxi, a highly regarded Indian jurist. 'It confirms what we have known for years and casts a shadow on the integrity of the judiciary. It also "

MOCKERRY OF FRIENDLY CITIZENS CHARTER!!!!!!

This is a classic example to prove that much trumpeted grievance handling system of the Govt. of India is just a FARCE.

"Whistleblowing"

Commerce Ministry’s fraud On Govt.Employees Covered Under CCS Pension Rules-1972

Export Inspection Council-a statutory body under Commerce Dept. which is also an “administrative ministry” implemented a special voluntary retirement scheme (SVRS)in 1994 fraudulently without involving the NODAL departments-in violation of Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules made by His Excellency The President of India under Article 77(3) of Indian Constitution.

Thus ILLEGAL SVRS-1994 has floated all rules/norms applicable under CCS Pension Rules of 1972 in gross violation of Articles 309, 313, 372 &144 of the Constitution.

This clandestine action is being covered by the following departments willfully for reasons best known to them:

1.Department of Personnel & Training.

2.Department of Pension & Pensioners Welfare.

3.Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances.

4.Central Information Commission.

For more details please visit : http://venkym.blogspot.com/

FRIENDLY CITIZEN’S CHARTERS!!!! Record of my efforts in search of justice: It took 11years &5 months to get a correct informtion on SVRS.Thanks to Right to Informtion Act-2005 !!!!God only knows when my ordeal will end!!!!!!!!!
1. 30.05.1994 Letter asking EIA, Madras for clarifications on VRS terms.
2. 31.05.1994-MS/ADMN/Gen/94-95-1134 -Refusal reply.
3. 06.06.1994-Letter to EIA, Madras on Pay commission & other doubts. (Not replied)
4. 06.12.1994-Letter on Non payment of VRS benefits. (Not replied)
5. 06.01.1995-Part payment received under protest.
6. 07.01.1995-Letter for pending payment & interest. (No reply)
7. 25.01.1995-Reminder for payment/protest. (No reply)
8. 29.03.1995-Letter to the then Commerce Secretary . (No reply)
9. 29.03.1995-Copy to Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions.
10. 21.04.1995-Reply from above ministry; F.No36306/3/DCOM/PD-95
11. 17.04.1997-Letter to Director for payment of weightage & DA (No reply)
12. 06.10.1997-Part payment received under protest.
13. 13.10.1997-Letter asking full VRS benefits. (No reply)
14. 14.10.1997-Letter to DD on payment. (No reply)
15. 23.11.2000-Appeal to Commerce secretary-citing Calcutta High Court order No: 6373(W) of 1995 Dt.26.11.1996 with copies to the Under Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions/Secretary-Pension & Pensioners Welfare/Director-Inspection & Quality Control. (No replies).
16. 04.02.2003-Letter to the Secretary, Directorate of Public Grievances-DPG/M/2003/80011 (Replied on 17.02.03).
17. 14.02.2003-Copy to Joint Secretary, Vigilance/Staff grievances (Shri.S.Ramasundaram) fax/email.(No reply)
18. 20.03.2003-Fax Reminder to The Commerce Secretary ( Shri. Dipak Chatterji).
19. 26.03.2003-Final appeal to the Hon’ble Minister for Commerce, Govt. of India.
20. 02.04.2003-Reply fm Shri.Mangal singh,Under Sec.,Dt.28.03.2003.
21. 10.04.2003-sent fax to Under.Sec. for a specific reply on the complaint.(sent post copy also-29/4)
22. 17.05.2003-Reply Dt.09.05.2003 fm Under Sec.
23. 23.06.2003-Recd.copy of communication Dt.31.05.2003sent by Shri.L.V.Saptharishi directing D(Q/C) to give a reply by 15.06.2003.
24. 24.07.2003-Fax reminder to the Addl.Sec.Shri.L.V.Saptharishi. (No reply)
25. 18.08.2003-Fax to Jt.Sec.Shri.P.K.Deb.,DOPT.request for documents.
26. 12.09.2003-EIC reply:vrs/121/2003/4409-dt.9/9/2003 received.(inadequate reply)
27. 13.09.2003 fax appeal for documents to EIC & DOPT (No reply)
28. 21.09.2003 fax reminder for DQC/EIC. (No reply)
29. 02.10.2003 fax reminder for DQC. (No reply)
30. 02,10.2003 fax message for Secretary S.S.Dawra, DOPT (No reply)
31. 02.10.2003 fax message for Jt.Sec.(AT&A)IFC/DOPT (No reply)
32. 06.10.2003 fax copy to EIA,Chennai. (No reply)
33. 15.10.2003 Final fax reminder for DQC.(No reply)
34. 29.10.2003 Fax to shri.S.S.Dawra, Secretary,DOPT.(No reply)
35. 31.10.2003 Fax to shri.Arun Jaitley,Hon’ble Commerce minister.(No reply)
36. 15.11.2003 Fax to DQC/EIC.(No reply)
37. 08.3.2004 Fax to Shri.Alok/Shri.MVPC Sastry with email copies.(No reply)
38. 23.04.04 Fax appeal to DOPT
39. 07.06.2004 DOPT reply recd.-Note sheet.
40. 26.02.2005 Appeal to the Hon’ble President Of India by email/Fax.
41. 18.06.2005 Fax to Dr.Kalaam, Hon’ble President Of India.
42. 20.06.2005 Fax appeal to DQC/EIC.(No reply)
43. 08.08.2005 under Right to Information Act-fax to Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Pensions & Public Grievances.
44. 17.08.2005 Reply recd from DPT.
45. 04.10.2005 under Right to Information Act-fax to Secretary, Ministry of Commerce.
46. 04.10.2005 Fax to Mr.E.V.K.S.Elangovan-MOS for Commerce.
47. 10.10.2005 EIC finally replied with a letter Dt.21.05.1994 from Ministry of Commerce which admitted that this SVRS-1994 is not approved by the Govt. Of India. In spite of the Govt. refusal for SVRS-1994 The Commerce Ministry has arbitrarily/hurriedly/deliberately implemented the SVRS without involving nodal agency (DPT) in gross violation of Article 77(3) 309 of the Constitution. Hence this ambiguous SVRS-1994 circular Dt.21/5/1994 implemented by Commerce Ministry is ILLEGAL as it has violated the CCS Pension Rules of 1972 & the Articles 309,313,372 and 144 of the Constitution.
Though the scheme was claimed as VOLUNTARY, I was forced to submit the option Vide letter no: EIA: MS/Admn/gen/94-95/1134 dt.31.5.1994 even before clarifying the terms of the scheme on my first query Dt.30.05.1994.
SVRS-1994 circular dated 21st.May 1994 circulated by EIC deliberately omitted the facts contained in the ministry circular. Thus I have been deprived/kept in dark deliberately from opting Normal VRS under CCS pension rules.
I would not have opted this ILLEGAL SVRS-1994 had I received the original ministry’s circular (unedited by EIC).
So I am prepared to REPAY SOCALLED INCENTIVES received by me to ACCEPT THE NORMAL VRS Pension under CCS pension rules.

48. 17.10.2005 sought information under RIAct-2005- No reply
49. 13.12.2005 sent DD for information- Recd. Irrelevant information.
50. 21.12.2005 appeal to EIC appellate authority- No reply
51. 13.03.2006 e-mail to Smt.Shyamalima Banerjee. DIRECTOR (Public Grievances),DAR & PG, New Delhi. No reply. Recd. Directive on 6/5/06 to approach Dr.M.S.Rao,Jt.Sec.commerce.
52. 17.03.2006 reminder to appellate authority- No reply.
53. 18.04.2006 Fax appeal to commerce Secretary to activate EIC. (with copy to EIC)
54. 20.04.2006 Recd. Part of information from EIC.
55. 20.04.2006 Fax to appellate authority. Please kindly note another appeal-RT1124 on the ambiguous EIC circular is still pending before you. (with regard to the suppression of facts & allocation of business rules).
56. 06.05.2006 Latest Appeal to Smt.Shyamalima Banerjee,Diector (public Grievances).
57. 06.05.2006 Appeal copy forwarded to Dr.M.S.Rao
58. 07.05.2005 Appeal c.c to: Staff Grievance Officer, Shri P.K. Mahapatra, Joint Secretary, Room No. 247, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi (Tele fax No. 23063461; E-mail: pkmahapatra@nic.in ).
55-A 15.05.006 Fax to The Apellate Authority,EIC
59. 16.05.2006 Appeal DPG-59faxed to EIC for onward transmission to Dr.M.S.R
60. 19.05.2006 c.c by fax to:Shri.R.Ramanujam,Jt.Sec.,DOPT
61. 20.05.2006 Fax /email appeal to PMO
62. 31.05.2006 c.c of 61 to Shri.Kamalnath,Commerce minister,GOI.
63. 01.06.2006 c.c -----------do---------Residence
64. 05.06.2006 c.c to Officer incharge,EIA,Chennai.
65. 06.06.2006 RIA-Christy Fernando,EIC Appellate committee.
66. 12.06.2006 RIA-Hon’ble Central Chief Infn.Commissioner.
67. 17.06.2006 c.c of Ref-61 to Commerce Minister.
68. 26.06.2006 c.c of Ref-PMO61 to Central Chief Information Commissioner.
69. 03.07.2006 email to CIC
70. 03.07.2006 email to KABIR (NGO)-Ref-68 (Ack. Mail recd.on4.7.06)
71. 06.07.2006 Fax & email to DQC-asking for ack.Grieva3/3/06 of Com.ministry.
72. 06.07.2006 online Gri.regn-DPG-59(DARPG/E/2006/06471)
73. 14.07.2006 Fax/email Reminder to Griev.cell,Director,commerceDept.FT(coord).
74. 17.07.2006 email to CIC/KABIR
74A.20.07.2006 email reminder-II to EIC/C.Secretary.
75.24.07.2006 email to Smt. Soniya Gandhi,Congress President.
76. 04.08.2006 email to C.Secretary for status report
77. 23.08.2006 Reminder-IV to C.S/EIC
78. 24.08.2006 Fax to Shri.kamalnath,MC&I.
79. 01.09.2006 Fax to DIQC final reminder.
80. 01.09.2006 fax to DARPG with cc to.DOPT,PP&W,PMO
81. 02/3.09.06 Fax to Dr.MSRao,Final reminder
82. 06.09.2006 Fax/email to PKMahapatra Udyog bhawan with cc to EIC
83. 06.09.2006 Fax reply to EIC for rejecting my appeal
84. 12.09.2006 Fax to DARPG -84 with cc to PMO
84a.14.09.2006 Fax to Rahul Sarin. Addl.Secretary, DARPG.
85. 17.09.2006 email to CJI, Ref –CJI-85 with c.c to CJ,Chennai HC.
86. 02.10.2006 Reply to AnjuSharma,Commerce Ministry
87.23.11.2006 Fax to C.Secretary-Final appeal for settlement
88.22.12.2006 Fax to DARPG-88 with c.c to PMO
89.15.12.2007 Fax to DARPG-89 with c.c to PMO on 14/2/07

90. 22.01.2008 Fax/email to Hon’ble President.

91. 04.02.2008 Fax to CJ,Chennai-WP-16155.

92. 09.02.2008 Fax/mail to CIC-Ref.08/02

93. 09.02.2008 Fax to AN Tiwari CIC-Ref.DPT-69

94. 10.02.2008 Fax to CIC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efforts are on to highlight soon through the mass media, how the much trumpeted Grievance Handling System of the Govt.& Grievance redressal machinery have become a mockery!!!! Please visit the website: http://venkym.blogspot.com

This is the only SVRS directive issued by DOPT which is empowered to frame schemes/procedures for Govt.employees covered under CCS Pension Rules.Hence the 1994-SVRS fraudulantly implemented by EIC/Commerce Ministry is ILLEGAL & in Total violation of Constitutional Provisions. click the image to enlarge

WHY CASES ARE FAILING?

REASON:As the commerce ministry & EIC stealthly implemented the ILLEGAL SVRS most of the letigants still believe the scheme is approved by Govt. which is not a fact.Hense their prayers asking for additional benefits like weightage,Dearness relief on pension,interest on delayed payments are IRRELEVENT.
Unless untill the SVRS-1994 is challenged nothing will happen.
SO PLEASE WAKEUP & FILE REVISED PRAYERS TO DECLARE THE SCHEME ITSELF AS "NULL & VOID"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FINAL APPEAL FOR SETTLEMENT

From: M.Venkatesan, November23, 2006
16, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street, Ref-87
Westmambalam,
CHENNAI-600 033

To: The Commerce Secretary,
Ministry of Commerce & Industry, GOI,
Udyog bhavan, New Delhi. Fax :011 23061796

Sir,
Sub: Mockery of Grievance handling system.
Ref: 3/3/2006-Grievance Dt.20th.Sep2006


FINAL APPEAL FOR SETTLEMENT

Commerce Ministry's ambiguous letter referred in the Export Inspection Council letter No.VRS/121/2006/5668 Dt.15.11.2006 is the proof for illegal SVRS-1994, as point no.2 in page2 admits that the Govt. is not obliged to formulate or approve any such scheme.
This is confirmed by Department of Personnel & Training vide their letter No.134/2005-Estt (A) Dt.18th.Aug.2005.

In spite of the fact that Govt. has turned down your SVRS-1994 proposal Commerce Ministry/EIC deliberately deleted/manipulated this portion of circular to cheat the employees. (Suppression of facts).Thus without revealing the original letter signed by Mrs.Suma Subbanna to employees, through clandestine action of the Commerce Ministry/EIC officials this ILLEGAL SVRS-1994 was implemented arbitrarily in violation of articles309,313,372 &144 of Constitution.

This letter itself is a confession of Commerce Ministry's infringement of Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules (In ignoring the empowered nodal Depts. Personnel & Training/Dept. of Pensions in blatant violation of rule 29 of the CCS Pension rule 1972).

FINAL REQUEST: As a negotiated settlement I am prepared to return with interest all illegal benefits received by me to accept the normal VRS benefits permissible under CCS Pension Rules of 1972.

Please expedite.
Thanking you.
Sincerely yours,
Venkatesan.M

WPNo:16155/1997 M.VENKATESAN Ph:23700049

1. Application to be moved in HC for the REVISION OF PRAYER

2. Revised Prayer:
Normal retirement benefits to be awarded as applicable under CCS Pension rules of 1972 as I am prepared to refund all ILLEGAL AMOUNTS WITH INTEREST paid to me by the EIA.

Export Inspection Agency-a statutory body whose employees are governed by CCS Pension rules of 1972 has implemented illegally SVRS-1994 floating all rules/norms applicable under CCS Pension rules of 1972 in gross violation of articles 309,313,372 & 144 of the CONSTITUTION.

3. Counters filed by the EIA say that the scheme was floated by EIC & approved by Govt.

Violations given below:

· DOPT-Only nodal agency which is empowered to issue directives on surplus staff has not issued any circular pertaining to 1994-SVRS!!!!? Vide DPT No.134/2005-Estt.(A) Dt.18th.August 2005. NODAL DEPARRTENTS NOT INVOLVED
· Commerce Ministry is not empowered to Offer SVRS-1994. *
*
Allocation of Business Rules & the Transaction of Business Rules made by His Excellency The President of India under Article 77 (3) of Constitution of India-cited below:
1.“ Formation of policies” in relation to “pension and other Retirement benefits and other aspects of Personnel Administration” and the “Framing Rules” thereupon, under the “Proviso” to article 309 of the Constitution, are exclusively within the “domain” of the NODAL department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare (especially in cases INVOLVING significant recurring financial implications, under the Department of Expenditure as well); and

2.the exercise of SUPERORDINATE powers in relation to INTERPRETATION/RELAXATION of “any” of the provisions of the aforementioned Rules, inter alia the CCS (commutation of pension) Rules, 1981 is per se exclusively “reserved” to the NODAL Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare and NONE in the “administrative” Ministries/Departments like the Department of Commerce.
· Under Right To Information Act-2005 I got the following ministry of commerce circular:No.3/8/91-EI &EP Dt.21/5/1994 which clearly states that Govt. has not approved this SVRS. However EIA has deliberately suppressed **this fact in its circular & forced /cheated the employees without giving other options (48,48A,FR56-K) as required under Rule 29 of CCS Pension rule of 1972.
**
The clandestine action of the Export Inspection Council( in consultation with Department of Commerce) on the 21st.May 1994 circular- a blemish of “ignoring or overlooking” (willfully) is in violation of Article 144 of Constitution.

Ref: AIR 1989 SC 1133
“EMPLOYEES should NOT be made to suffer ADVERSLY for the DEFAULT OR LAPSE on the part of Government, as it would be ARBITRARY, UNJUST AND UNREASONABLE”

· SVRS was thrust stealthily on me as the dept. has directed me first to apply for VRS before giving explanations about the scheme. I was forced to submit the option Vide letter no: EIA:MS/Admn/gen/94-95/1134 dt.31.5.1994 even before clarifying the terms of the scheme. Deprived my rights for seeking information.



Venkatesan.M
Chennai-33
16th.July2006
WP No.16155/1997

OR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THIS SUIT & TO FILE A FRESH SUIT

My 11years continuous efforts for information from EIC finally succeeded with the introduction of Right to Information Act. I received a reply on 17th.Oct.2005.
The ambiguous SVRS-1994 is ILLEGAL as the Ministry of Commerce itself admits in the letter dt.21/5/1994 that the Govt does not approve the scheme. However the ministry implemented it arbitrarily in gross violation of CCS Pension Rules-1972 &
Articles 309,313,372 and 144 of the Constitution.
In the light of above latest evidences, the cause of action for this suit is entirely changed due to the latest information received by me from the ministry of commerce (EIC/D (Q/C) VRS/121/2005/5195 Dt.10.10.2005) under Right to Information Act-2005. So Hon’ble Court may permit me to withdraw this suit & to file a fresh suit to challenge the SVRS-1994 scheme itself and to get the entire legitimate benefits under the CCS Pension Rules-1972.

FOLLOWING IS THE REPLY FOR THE REJECTION OF MY APPEAL BY EIC. BOTH COMMERCE MINISTRY & EIC ARE EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CHEATING THE EMPLOYEES BY THEIR CLANDESTINE ACTIONS WHICH THEY STILL CONTINUE.



From: M.Venkatesan, October 02, 2006
16, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street, Ref-86
Westmambalam,
CHENNAI-600 033

To: Attn: Anju Sharma,
The Director, FT Coord., Commerce Ministry,
Room no.425
Udyog bhavan, New Delhi.

Dear Madam,
Sub: Mockery of Grievance handling system.
Ref: 3/3/2006-Grievance Dt.20th.Sep2006
Congrats on joining the elite group of Directors/Senior Officials who are making a mockery of Citizens charter. EIC is under the administrative control of your commerce ministry which should have attached a reply of Dr.M.S.Rao or DOPT’s directives in support of its flagrant bluff dt.4.9.2006.
In the absence of any supporting documents from EIC my petition cannot be treated as closed.
Thanks for the excellent job of transmitting the copy of EIC letter.
Sincerely Yours,
Venkatesan.M
Chennai.

C.c to: fax to Rahul Sarin. Addl.Secretary, DARPG.
C.c to: email to Dr.M.S.Rao, mvpcs@ub.nic.in

PleaseVisit http://venkym.blogspot.com/

Copy of email message sent on 24th.Sep.2006
To:Attn:Anjusharma,Director,Room no.425A,Ministry of Commerce & Industry,NewDelhi.

Forwarding an evasive statement of EIC (4/9/2006) cannot be considered as a reply as it has not substantiated its claim by furnishing copies of relevant DOPT directives.
-VENKATESAN.M

Copy to:Shri.Rahul Sarin,Addl.Secretary,DARPG.

C.C to Shri. Gopal K.Pillai, Commerce Secretary with a special request to expedite.√√
____________________________________________________________________

From: M.Venkatesan, September 12, 2006 Ref-DARPG-84
16, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street,
Westmambalam, CHENNAI-600 033.
Telefax: +91 44 23700049 email: venkym1@sancharnet.in

To:
Shri.Suvrathan. Addl.Secretary, DARPG.
Fax: +91 11 23742133

URGENT & PRIORITY PLEASE

Dear Sir,
Ref: DARPG-80 dt.1st.Sep.2006
A reply received from the Export Inspection Council vide VRS/121/2006/3848 Dt.4.9.2006 is aimed at covering up their lapse & without an aorta of truth. Now the ball is in your court which has ample powers to verify & even to punish those found guilty as citizen’s charter points. It is up to you now to declare whether 1994-SVRS implemented by Commerce ministry is constitutionally valid or not & suggest appropriate remedial actions. I am asking for justice & my legitimate rights only.
Since the matter is serious, simultaneous actions will be initiated with media, parliament & judiciary on getting your final reply which is going to be a part of key evidence.
Please expedite & give your decision as soon as possible.

Thanking you.
Sincerely Yours,
Venkatesan.M
Chennai-33

Copy to: Dr.Manmohan Singh., Hon’ble PM, In charge DOPT.Fax: 23019545 √√

FINAL APPEAL FOR A SETTLEMENT SENT TO THE COMMERCE MINISTRY


From: M.Venkatesan, May 06, 2006
Ref:DPG-5916, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street,
Westmambalam,
CHENNAI-600 033.

To: Dr. M.S. Rao,
Joint Secretary, Dept. Of commerce, Room No. 247, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi.
Telefax: 23016461
m_srao@ub.nic.in

Through The Director, Export Inspection council of India, New Delhi.
(Ref:DPG-59)

Dear Sir,
Sub: Surrender of incentives received under illegal SVRS-1994.

After 12 years of effort I could get hold of a circular under Right To Information Act-2005.Original circular no: 3/8/91-EI & EP Dt. 21May1994 issued by the ministry was manipulated by the then Director of EIC to cheat the officers/staff. Govt. of India under the Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules has empowered The Department of Personnel &Training (as Nodal Dept) to frame the rules/regulations to be implemented by all other ministries.
Hence SVRS-1994 of EIC is illegal & in violation of articles 144,309,313 & 372 of Constitution of India.
I am prepared to repay the so called illegal incentives received by me to accept the normal VRS benefits under the CCS Pension Rules of 1972.

Hope this will receive your kind attention to end my ordeal & mental agony.
Thanking you.
Sincerely Yours,

Chennai-33
16th.May2006

√c.c to: Staff Grievance Officer, Shri P.K. Mahapatra, Joint Secretary, Room No. 247, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi (Tele fax No. 23063461; E-mail: pkmahapatra@nic.in).Ref:DPG-58

As fax number 23016461 is not responding this message is being faxed to Commerce Secretary Number 23061796# for onward transmission to Dr.MSR.
Ref: DPG-57 (Advance copy)

EIA employees cases-WP/WA-Status
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
1. Sunil Kumar Das + 27 others WP-6373-1995 Judgement Dt.26.11.1996
EIA has been directed to pay all dues with 12% interest within one month & directed the employees to take up other issues(rights) in appropriate fora.
2. EIC filed CAN Application -9099-1998 but dismissed by court.
3.MAT2344 OF 2001
4. SMA102OF 2004
5.CAN5882OF 2007(all these are related to item no.2)
6.Mat-3762/3763-1998
7. Sukriti bhusan Roy-W.P-574 -2008 -Challenging the Scheme &Demands restoration of Pension-Final hearing over-Judgment awaited.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHENNAI HIGH COURT
1. R.S.Balasubramaniam WP-13104-1997 Demands DA-On 9.6.2008 judge directed EIA to pay as they did in Kolkatta.-Response from EIC awaited.
2. M.Venkatesan WP-16155-1997 Demands Pension -A fresh writ is also being filed to speedup as revised prayer may or may not be considered by the sitting Judge at the time of hearing. **
3. S.Krishnamurthy WP-16289-1997 ------Do---------- **
4. Ramasubramanian+12 others WP-12030-1998 weightage + pension **
5. K.E.Ramalingam WP-660-1999 Dismissed by bench on appeal. –Demands DA
6. N.Kalyanaraman + 7 others WP-958-1999 –Demand pension **
7. E.P.Srinivasan & V.N -WP-46130-2002 **
(Posted for hearing by Bench 6 cases(2-7) on 30th.July2008)Judgment delivered on 16th.Sep -Pension declined & employees directed to EIA for DA/DR.
8. Sethuramanathan WP-9466-2006 Demands pension
9.M.Venkatesan WP-10442-2008-Challenging the scheme as the cause of action is totally changed -Pending
** On 24.6.2008 Judge referred all 6 cases for Full bench hearing as EIA did not provide the details of SLP it filed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KOCHI HIGH COURT
WA-617-2000
WA-42- 2001
WA-676-2002 All three WAppeals dismissed on 29.10.2004-An unique judgement directing the petitioners to appeal to the ministry.(treated like beggars)
WP-34008-2005 Some petitioners have gone for Revision Petition.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MUMBAI HIGH COURT
1.WP-1391-2000 by 13 persons-Pending
2.WP-214-2003 by 18 persons-Pending
Prayer: Full DA or surrender of 2/3rd. commuted pension for resumption of Full pension & 5years weightage for those with 15years qualifying service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW DELHI HIGH COURT/SUPREME COURT
Civil Writ-5335-1995 is still pending.
LPA-(Letter Patent Appeal) 454-2001 by 23 people-Dismissed on the principle of estoppel as they have not challenged the legality & the validity of the scheme but demanded more benefits under the scheme.
Supreme court-Petition for Special Leave to Appeal-9772-2003-Also dismissed.
Review Petition No.1201-2003 in SLP-9772-2003-Dismissed.
*Fresh writ filed challenging the scheme by Mr.Saxena
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vital proof for the violation of Allocation of business rules & transaction of business rules.Click on the image to magnify.

This message- a note sheet reply received from Dept. of Personnel & Training categorically deneying issue of any SVRS directives prior to 2002. click the image to magnify.

DOPT is the Nodal agencywhich is empowered to frame rules/regulations/schemes for central govt.employees under Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules.All other depts like Commerce ministry etc. have to implement the directives of DOPT

WP No.16155/1997-Gist for the argument:

· In his counter affidavit the learned Joint Director Shri.S.Talukdar has revealed the Real intentions of the EIC under para-7 for formulating magnificent SVRS-1994-Reason stated: REDUCED WORK LOAD (meaning SURPLUS STAFF)

· EIC-A Statutory body & Governed by CCS Pension Rules-Instead of approaching NODAL DEPTS with SURPLUS LIST of employees or Redeployment PROPASALS cheated the employees by designing the Impugned SVRS-1994 deliberately suppressing the motives (by not incorporating them in the circular dt.21st.May1994). Also hurriedly implemented the ILLEGAL scheme (in violation of Article 77(3) of the constitution of India).

· As per the Govt. of India Allocation of Business rules & transaction of Business rules (1961) under Article 309 0f Constitution ONLY NODAL agencies like Dept. of Personnel & Training and Dept. of Pension & Pensioners Welfare were EMPOWERED to give necessary directives on service matters of employees. Hence SVRS-1994 is Ultra Vires.

· Though the scheme was claimed as VOLUNTARY, I was forced to submit the option Vide letter no: EIA: MS/Admn/gen/94-95/1134 dt.31.5.1994 even before clarifying the terms of the scheme.

· Also we were indirectly forced by delayed payment of salaries for two months especially after the release of circular dt.21.5.1994.Coupled with the tactics of the then Acting Director Shri.S.Lakshmikanthan who made 3 visits from Delhi to motivate the employees in an open office meeting conducted on 22nd.June 1994.

· I would not have opted this ILLEGAL SVRS-1994 provided the decisions of the Govt. as pointed out in the counters have been properly incorporated in the SVRS-1994 circular dated 21st.May 1994. Thus I have been deprived/kept in dark deliberately from opting Normal VRS under CCS pension rules.

· So I am prepared to REPAY SOCALLED INCENTIVES received by me to ACCEPT THE NORMAL VRS Pension under CCS pension rules.

· I pray the Hon’ble Court to end my long mental agony by suitable directives and restore the Justice.




M.VENKATESAN

From: M.Venkatesan, May 06, 2006
Ref:DPT-6016, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street,
Westmambalam,
CHENNAI-600 033.

To: Dr. M.S. Rao,
Joint Secretary, Dept. Of commerce, Room No. 247, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi.
Telefax: 23061796# m_srao@ub.nic.in

Through The Director, Export Inspection council of India, New Delhi.

Dear Sir,
Sub: Surrender of incentives received under illegal SVRS-1994.
After 12 years of effort I could get hold of a circular under Right To Information Act-2005.Original circular no: 3/8/91-EI & EP Dt. 21May1994 issued by the ministry was manipulated* by the then Director of EIC to cheat the officers/staff. Govt. of India under the Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules has empowered** The Department of Personnel &Training (as Nodal Dept) to frame the rules/regulations to be implemented by all other ministries.
Hence SVRS-1994 of EIC is illegal & in violation of articles 144,309,313 & 372 of Constitution of India.
I am prepared to repay the so called illegal incentives received by me with interest to accept the normal VRS benefits under the CCS Pension Rules of 1972.
Hope this will receive your kind attention to end my ordeal & mental agony.
Thanking you.
Sincerely Yours,
Chennai-33
16th.May2006

√c.c to: Staff Grievance Officer, Shri P.K. Mahapatra, Joint Secretary, Room No. 247, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi (Tele fax No. 23063461; E-mail: pkmahapatra@nic.in).Ref:DPG-58
As fax number 23016461 is not responding this message is being faxed to Commerce Secretary Number 23061796# for onward transmission to Dr.MSR.
Ref: DPG-57 (Advance copy)
√ c.c to The Jt.Secretay(AT &A)DOPTFax:23092580/email:ramaujam@alpha.nic.in
√ c.c to The Director,Dept of Pension &Pensioners Welfare.Fax:24624802 email:singhmp@hub.nic.in
Please note that again EIA introduced SVRS vide: EIC/D (Q/C) 121/2002/1815 Dt.1.6.2002 based on OM No: 25013/6/2001-Estt. (A) Of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Dept. of Personnel & Training.
√ c.c to PMO

*
The clandestine action of the Export Inspection Council( in consultation with Department of Commerce) on the 21st.May 1994 circular- a blemish of “ignoring or overlooking” (willfully) is in violation of Article 144 of Constitution.

Ref: AIR 1989 SC 1133
“EMPLOYEES should NOT be made to suffer ADVERSLY for the DEFAULT OR LAPSE on the part of Government, as it would be ARBITRARY, UNJUST AND UNREASONABLE”

**
Allocation of Business Rules & the Transaction of Business Rules made by His Excellency The President of India under Article 77 (3) of Constitution of India-cited below:
1.“ Formation of policies” in relation to “pension and other Retirement benefits and other aspects of Personnel Administration” and the “Framing Rules” thereupon, under the “Proviso” to article 309 of the Constitution, are exclusively within the “domain” of the NODAL department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare (especially in cases INVOLVING significant recurring financial implications, under the Department of Expenditure as well); and

2.the exercise of SUPERORDINATE powers in relation to INTERPRETATION/RELAXATION of “any” of the provisions of the aforementioned Rules, inter alia the CCS (commutation of pension) Rules, 1981 is per se exclusively “reserved” to the NODAL Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare and NONE in the “administrative” Ministries/Departments like the Department of Commerce.


Copy to: Hon’ble Minister of Commerce Shri. Shri Kamal Nath with a special request to expedite my appeal.

THANKS TO RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 WHICH EXPOSED THE
BIGGEST FRAUD ON GOVT. EMPLOYEES IN BLATANT VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTION BY COMMERCE MINISTRY OFFICIALS

Export Inspection Agency a statutory body under commerce ministry is governed by the CCS Pension Rules of 1972. After 12 years of effort I could get hold of a circular under Right To Information Act-2005.Original ambiguous circular no: 3/8/91-EI & EP Dt. 21May1994 issued by the ministry was manipulated by the then Director of EIC Shri.S.Lakshmikanthan to cheat the officers/staff. Govt. of India under the Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules has empowered The Department of Personnel &Training (as Nodal Dept) to frame the rules/regulations to be implemented by all other ministries. DOPT-Nodal dept. has replied in writing that it has not issued any other directives other than 2002-SVRS circular.
Hence SVRS-1994 implemented through clandestine actions of Commerce Ministry/ EIC is illegal & in violation of articles 144,309,313 & 372 of Constitution of India.
To get back our legitimate rights simultaneous actions are contemplated through Media, Parliament & Judiciary.
All employees who were in PENSION scheme but took the ILLEGAL SVRS in 1994 are requested to get in touch with me with the latest contact details immediately.
M.Venkatesan,
16, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street,
Westmambalam, CHENNAI-600 033.
Telefax: +91 44 23700049 email: venkym1@sancharnet.in
September 14, 2006